Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA vs Ashley, 5:17-PO-00384-JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180208884 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING FORTH BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DE 6] JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . BACKGROUND On January 25, 2018, defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (DE 6). Local Rules 430.1(d) and (e) sets forth a general limit of seven days for any party to file a response in opposition to such motions, and three days for the moving party to file a reply. However, the parties in this case require additional time to brief and
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING FORTH BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DE 6]

BACKGROUND

On January 25, 2018, defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (DE 6). Local Rules 430.1(d) and (e) sets forth a general limit of seven days for any party to file a response in opposition to such motions, and three days for the moving party to file a reply. However, the parties in this case require additional time to brief and file such pleadings.

THEREFORE, defendant Richard Ashley, by and through his counsel Andrew Wong, and plaintiff the United States of America, by and through its counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney Joshua Vann, hereby stipulate and agree to the following briefing schedule and request that the Court enter an order reflecting that schedule:

1. Any opposition by the United States must be filed on or before February 19, 2018. 2. Any reply by the defendant must be filed on or before March 5, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer