Filed: Feb. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff John Keller, by and through his appointed pro bono attorney, and Defendants Office of Correctional Safety, Garrett, and West, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, attorney's f
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff John Keller, by and through his appointed pro bono attorney, and Defendants Office of Correctional Safety, Garrett, and West, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, attorney's fe..
More
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff John Keller, by and through his appointed pro bono attorney, and Defendants Office of Correctional Safety, Garrett, and West, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice.
Each party is to bear his own costs, attorney's fees, and expenses.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. All parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
