Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc., 2:08-cv-02556-MCE-DB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180212407 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DTSC'S ENFORCEMENT COSTS MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . The Court having reviewed the motion of Plaintiff the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC") against Defendants Sterling CentreCorp, Inc. ("Sterling"), Stephen P. Elder and Elder Development, Inc. (collectively, "Elder") for an award of enforcement response costs, the declarations and exhibits in support thereof, as well as the opposition and reply papers, and good cause appearing; IT I
More

ORDER REGARDING DTSC'S ENFORCEMENT COSTS

The Court having reviewed the motion of Plaintiff the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC") against Defendants Sterling CentreCorp, Inc. ("Sterling"), Stephen P. Elder and Elder Development, Inc. (collectively, "Elder") for an award of enforcement response costs, the declarations and exhibits in support thereof, as well as the opposition and reply papers, and good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1) DTSC's motion ((ECF No. 305) is GRANTED. 2) As of April 5, 2016, DTSC incurred recoverable unreimbursed enforcement response costs of at least $476,754.94 in connection with the Lava Cap Mine Superfund Site in Nevada County; 3) These costs were not inconsistent with the National Contingency Plan and are therefore recoverable against Defendants pursuant to section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer