Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Silva v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00513-GSA. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180213533 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended until March 14, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due to conflicting due date
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Opening Brief be extended until March 14, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond. Defense counsel requires additional time to fully review the administrative record and consider the government's position due to conflicting due dates. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Defendant shall file any Opposition/Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16), no later than March 14, 2018. Any reply shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer