Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Bernstine, 2:17-cr-00177-JAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180213576 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Assistant United States Attorney Cameron Desmond, attorney for Plaintiff and Federal Defender Heather Williams through Assistant Federal Defender Mia Crager, attorney for defendant WILJAY BERNSTINE that the status conference, currently scheduled for February 13, 2018, be continued to March 13, 2018 at 9:15 a.m. The r
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Assistant United States Attorney Cameron Desmond, attorney for Plaintiff and Federal Defender Heather Williams through Assistant Federal Defender Mia Crager, attorney for defendant WILJAY BERNSTINE that the status conference, currently scheduled for February 13, 2018, be continued to March 13, 2018 at 9:15 a.m.

The reasons for this continuance is that defense needs additional time review the discovery with her client, request further discovery from the government, and prepare an investigation of the facts in this case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including March 13, 2018; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including March 13, 2018, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the February 13, 2018 status conference shall be continued until March 13, 2018, at 9:15 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer