Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Defrenza v. Progressive Express Insurance Company, 1:16-cv-00736 AWI JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180216794 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (Doc. 34) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. 34) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wil
More

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (Doc. 34)

The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with prejudice. (Doc. 34) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation, it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer