Waltrip v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-01390-EFB (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180216834
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FOURTEEN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate that, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be granted a fourteen-day extension from the current February 16, 2018 deadline to file Plaintiff's Reply Brief to March 2, 2018. There is good cause for this extension because there is a conflict in the records requires which further investigation in order to reply accurately to
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FOURTEEN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate that, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be granted a fourteen-day extension from the current February 16, 2018 deadline to file Plaintiff's Reply Brief to March 2, 2018. There is good cause for this extension because there is a conflict in the records requires which further investigation in order to reply accurately to t..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FOURTEEN EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate that, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be granted a fourteen-day extension from the current February 16, 2018 deadline to file Plaintiff's Reply Brief to March 2, 2018. There is good cause for this extension because there is a conflict in the records requires which further investigation in order to reply accurately to the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment. My legal assistant is out of the country returning next week and I am unable to shift the work load which has been exceptionally heavy these last two weeks.
Therefore, the parties jointly request an extension up to and including March 2nd, 20184`.
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
