U.S. v. Kennedy, 2:11-CR-427 TLN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180222b52
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING RESTITUTION HEARING; ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on February 22, 2018. 2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court vacate the currently scheduled restitution hearing. 3. As of today's date, no victi
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING RESTITUTION HEARING; ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on February 22, 2018. 2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court vacate the currently scheduled restitution hearing. 3. As of today's date, no victim..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING RESTITUTION HEARING; ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on February 22, 2018.
2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court vacate the currently scheduled restitution hearing.
3. As of today's date, no victim has submitted complete documentation regarding their entitlement to restitution or the identity of the entity that suffered the final loss in this case. The parties agree that, should a victim submit the required documentation, the government may request that the matter of restitution be reopened.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
