Logan v. Horowitz, 2:15-cv-0121 MCE AC P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180227738
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . On February 20, 2018, the court received plaintiff's most recent motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 147. In his motion, plaintiff claims that he has not had access to the law library since November 3, 2017. Id. Defendants shall be required to respond to plaintiff's motion and specifically address the issue of plaintiff's alleged lack of access to the law library since November 3, 2017. Acc
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . On February 20, 2018, the court received plaintiff's most recent motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 147. In his motion, plaintiff claims that he has not had access to the law library since November 3, 2017. Id. Defendants shall be required to respond to plaintiff's motion and specifically address the issue of plaintiff's alleged lack of access to the law library since November 3, 2017. Acco..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
On February 20, 2018, the court received plaintiff's most recent motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 147. In his motion, plaintiff claims that he has not had access to the law library since November 3, 2017. Id. Defendants shall be required to respond to plaintiff's motion and specifically address the issue of plaintiff's alleged lack of access to the law library since November 3, 2017.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall respond to plaintiff's motion for extension of time within fourteen days of service of this motion. Defendants shall specifically address the issue of plaintiff's alleged lack of access to the law library since November 3, 2017.
Source: Leagle
