Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sprinkle v. Robinson, 2:02-cv-01563 JAM EFB (PC). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180228b29 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER VACATING WRIT AD TESTIFICANDUM JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The plaintiff has alerted the Court that he is not interested in settling this matter. 1 (Doc. 196) Likewise, the Court has been advised that previous settlement communications between the plaintiff and the defense attorney demonstrate that settlement does not appear to be feasible, given the widely divergent views of the settlement value of the case. Thus, the settlement co
More

ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

ORDER VACATING WRIT AD TESTIFICANDUM

The plaintiff has alerted the Court that he is not interested in settling this matter.1 (Doc. 196) Likewise, the Court has been advised that previous settlement communications between the plaintiff and the defense attorney demonstrate that settlement does not appear to be feasible, given the widely divergent views of the settlement value of the case. Thus, the settlement conference, set on March 1, 2018 is VACATED. Accordingly, inmate Mark Wayne Sprinkle CDC #K24619, is no longer needed by the Court in these proceedings and the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to transport this inmate on January 30, 2018 (Doc 194) is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The plaintiff's motion to vacate the settlement conference (Doc. 196) is GRANTED.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer