Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cervantes v. Ace Cash Express, Inc., 1:17-CV-01754-LJO-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180305735 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Aurora Cervantes ("Plaintiff") and Defendant ACE Cash Express, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have a 15-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Aurora Cervantes ("Plaintiff") and Defendant ACE Cash Express, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have a 15-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or before March 20, 2018.

The parties previously stipulated to a 28-day extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint. (Dkt. 7).

This stipulation will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order.

The reason for the present extension is that the parties are in the midst of negotiating a resolution of this matter.

Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this document on his behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that 15-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (on or before March 20, 2018).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer