Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bruno v. Equifax Information Serices, LLC, 2:17-cv-00327-WBS-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180313685 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR JOHN MCGINLEY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiff Daniel Bruno ("Plaintiff") and Defendant John McGinley hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on February 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed the instant action; WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Plaintiff filed an Amended Class Action Complaint; WHEREAS on February 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint; WHEREA
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR JOHN MCGINLEY'S RESPONSE TO THE SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Daniel Bruno ("Plaintiff") and Defendant John McGinley hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed the instant action;

WHEREAS on July 31, 2017, Plaintiff filed an Amended Class Action Complaint;

WHEREAS on February 27, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, through counsel, has agreed to a 10-day extension for John McGinley to respond to the Second Amended Class Action Complaint;

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and John McGinley stipulate as follows:

1. The time for John McGinley to respond to the amended complaint shall be extended by 10 additional days up to and including March 23, 2018; 2. This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments, and defenses of all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer