Bolton v. Sodergren, 1:16-cv-00298-SKO (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180319484
Visitors: 30
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 32) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Moser, Sodergren, and Steadman have filed an ex parte application for a forty-five-day extension of time in which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Having considered the application, the Court finds good cause to grant the extension request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' request for
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 32) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Moser, Sodergren, and Steadman have filed an ex parte application for a forty-five-day extension of time in which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Having considered the application, the Court finds good cause to grant the extension request. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' request for ..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 32)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Moser, Sodergren, and Steadman have filed an ex parte application for a forty-five-day extension of time in which to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Having considered the application, the Court finds good cause to grant the extension request.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' request for an extension of time (Doc. 32) is GRANTED; and,
2. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading no later than May 3, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
