Hoban v. Nova Casualty Company, 1:17-cv-00286-DAD-SKO. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180320830
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART SECOND JOINT STIPULATION TO REVISE THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 15) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the parties' second Joint Stipulation to Partially Revise the Court's Scheduling Order. (Doc. 15.) The parties indicate that they have agreed to participate in a private mediation on April 19, 2018, and, if unable to settle the action at the mediation, they expect to file dispositive motions on or before May 22, 2018, the current deadline. ( See
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART SECOND JOINT STIPULATION TO REVISE THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. 15) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the parties' second Joint Stipulation to Partially Revise the Court's Scheduling Order. (Doc. 15.) The parties indicate that they have agreed to participate in a private mediation on April 19, 2018, and, if unable to settle the action at the mediation, they expect to file dispositive motions on or before May 22, 2018, the current deadline. ( See ..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART SECOND JOINT STIPULATION TO REVISE THE SCHEDULING ORDER
(Doc. 15)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the parties' second Joint Stipulation to Partially Revise the Court's Scheduling Order. (Doc. 15.) The parties indicate that they have agreed to participate in a private mediation on April 19, 2018, and, if unable to settle the action at the mediation, they expect to file dispositive motions on or before May 22, 2018, the current deadline. (See id. at 2.) The parties further indicate that they do not believe that additional discovery efforts are necessary to accomplish this goal, and jointly wish to defer the costs associated with further discovery and expert discovery until after a ruling by the Court on the parties' dispositive motions, if any. (See id.) The parties also wish to continue the mandatory settlement conference until after the Court's ruling on dispositive motions. (See id.)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order (Doc. 8) be modified as follows:
EVENT CURRENT DATE NEW DATE
Non-expert discovery cut-off April 13, 2018 August 7, 2018
Expert disclosure April 20, 2018 August 7, 2018
Rebuttal expert disclosure April 27, 2018 August 14, 2018
Expert discovery cut-off May 14, 2018 August 29, 2018
Non-dispositive motion filing May 22, 2018 August 7, 2018
Non-dispositive motion hearing June 20, 2018 August 29, 2018
Settlement conference May 17, 2018 August 17, 2018 at 10:00
AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO)
before Magistrate Judge
Sheila K. Oberto.
All other previously-schedule dates remain unchanged, including the disposition motion filing and hearing deadlines, pre-trial conference, and trial date.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Pursuant to Rule 281(a)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, the parties' joint pretrial conference statement is due August 31, 2018. Several of the dates proposed by the parties have been adjusted to enable the parties to prepare a complete joint pretrial statement that incorporates the parties' discovery and the Court's rulings. Further, in order to allow the Court adequate time to rule, the parties are strongly encouraged to file their dispositive motions well in advance of the May 22, 2018, deadline.
Source: Leagle
