Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robles v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00566-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180321935 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to April 18, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant's counsel requests this additional time to further evaluate the merits of this case and determine whether settlement is appropriate.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to April 18, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant's counsel requests this additional time to further evaluate the merits of this case and determine whether settlement is appropriate.

This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Defendant shall have an extension of time, to and including April 18, 2018, in which to file a response Plaintiff's Opening Brief; and that all other deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer