Meyers v. County of Sacramento, 2:16-CV-01121-MCE-CKD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180322b64
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE THE SCHEDULING ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Good cause having been shown and there being no opposition, Defendants' Motion to Modify or Vacate the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. That scheduling order (ECF No. 3) is hereby modified as follows: 1. Not later than sixty (60) days after the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties shall confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f); 2. All discovery,
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE THE SCHEDULING ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Good cause having been shown and there being no opposition, Defendants' Motion to Modify or Vacate the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. That scheduling order (ECF No. 3) is hereby modified as follows: 1. Not later than sixty (60) days after the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties shall confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f); 2. All discovery, w..
More
ORDER ON MOTION TO MODIFY OR VACATE THE SCHEDULING ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Good cause having been shown and there being no opposition, Defendants' Motion to Modify or Vacate the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. That scheduling order (ECF No. 3) is hereby modified as follows:
1. Not later than sixty (60) days after the date this Order is electronically filed, the parties shall confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f);
2. All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed not later than three hundred sixty-five (365) days following the date this Order is electronically filed;
3. All other dates shall be calculated based on these changes; and
4. All other provisions shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
