Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trost v. Northbay Healthcare Corporation, 2:16-cv-2732-KJM-EFB PS. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180322b65 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff requests the court continue her deposition, which is was noticed for March 20, 2018, and the deposition of a witness, currently scheduled for March 22, 2018, to later dates. The only basis for her request is that she desires additional time to obtain new counsel. 1 As for her deposition, the date has already passed and therefore her request is moot. As for the witness' deposition, plaintiff has failed to provide any reason for why the
More

ORDER

Plaintiff requests the court continue her deposition, which is was noticed for March 20, 2018, and the deposition of a witness, currently scheduled for March 22, 2018, to later dates. The only basis for her request is that she desires additional time to obtain new counsel.1 As for her deposition, the date has already passed and therefore her request is moot. As for the witness' deposition, plaintiff has failed to provide any reason for why the deposition cannot proceed absent counsel.

Accordingly, her request to continue depositions, styled as a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 24) is denied.

FootNotes


1. This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer