Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lewis v. City of Fairfield, 2:16-cv-01053-JAM-AC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180323b03 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES AND ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff KEITH LEWIS and Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, AHMED KHALFAN, and COUNTY OF SOLANO, by and through their counsel of record, hereby represent to the Court as follows: On March 30, 2017 this Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order (Docket 21) setting, among other deadlines, a trial date of July 23, 2018 and a dispositive motion deadline of March 27, 2018. The Ci
More

AMENDED STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES AND ORDER

Plaintiff KEITH LEWIS and Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, AHMED KHALFAN, and COUNTY OF SOLANO, by and through their counsel of record, hereby represent to the Court as follows:

On March 30, 2017 this Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order (Docket 21) setting, among other deadlines, a trial date of July 23, 2018 and a dispositive motion deadline of March 27, 2018. The City filed an Objection to this Pretrial Scheduling Order (Docket 22) on April 4, 2017 noting its unavailability for trial on the date selected.

The parties have met and conferred regarding the trial date in this matter, and all are available for trial in early November, 2018. The parties request a trial date of November 5, 2018. The parties similarly request that the dispositive motion deadline be continued to correspond to the new trial date, and request a dispositive motion deadline of August 7, 2018.

Amended to add:

The parties request the following schedule with respect to trial setting and pre-trial deadlines:

Dispositive motion filing July 10, 2018 Dispositive motion hearing August 7, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. Joint pretrial statement due September 21, 2018 Pretrial conference September 28, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. Jury trial November 5, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

It is so stipulated and agreed.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation above, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer