Denegal v. Farrell, 1:15-cv-01251-DAD-MJS (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180403807
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS (ECF NO. 48) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. She is represented by appointed counsel. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion requesting that the Court expedite the proceedings. (ECF No. 48.) The motion was filed before counsel was appointed. Since the filing of Plaintiff's motion, Defendants have filed a motion for s
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS (ECF NO. 48) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. She is represented by appointed counsel. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion requesting that the Court expedite the proceedings. (ECF No. 48.) The motion was filed before counsel was appointed. Since the filing of Plaintiff's motion, Defendants have filed a motion for su..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS
(ECF NO. 48)
MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She is represented by appointed counsel. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion requesting that the Court expedite the proceedings. (ECF No. 48.) The motion was filed before counsel was appointed.
Since the filing of Plaintiff's motion, Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff has filed a motion to amend. (ECF No. 53, 56.) Both motions remain pending. They will be addressed in the usual course. It is not possible to expedite the proceedings. The motion is therefore HEREBY DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Also known as Fatima Shabazz.
Source: Leagle
