Lutrell v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00821-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180403825
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 17) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 29, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. (ECF No. 17). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 199
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 17) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 29, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. (ECF No. 17). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE
(ECF No. 17)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On March 29, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. (ECF No. 17). All parties have agreed to the dismissal. Id. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
