Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cervantes v. Wagstaff 100, Inc., 1:17-cv-01766-DAD-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180405821 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 9) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On April 2, 2018, Plaintiff Aurora Cervantes filed a notice to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 9). In light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); W ilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 , 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a moti
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

(ECF No. 9)

On April 2, 2018, Plaintiff Aurora Cervantes filed a notice to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 9). In light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer