Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Ryan, 1:17-cr-00305 LJO/SKO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180406a38 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE APRIL 16, 2018 STATUS CONFERENCE TO MAY 7, 2018; ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys of record, Assistant United States Attorney Brian W. Enos, counsel for the government, and John F. Garland, counsel for Defendant Blake Andrew Ryan ("defendant"), that this action's Monday, April 16, 2018 status conference be continued to Monday, May 7, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. The parties base this stipulation on
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE APRIL 16, 2018 STATUS CONFERENCE TO MAY 7, 2018; ORDER

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, through their respective attorneys of record, Assistant United States Attorney Brian W. Enos, counsel for the government, and John F. Garland, counsel for Defendant Blake Andrew Ryan ("defendant"), that this action's Monday, April 16, 2018 status conference be continued to Monday, May 7, 2018, at 1:00 p.m.

The parties base this stipulation on good cause. To explain, on January 3, 2018, defendant appeared at the U.S. District Court in Fresno, California (Courtroom 10) for his arraignment and detention hearing. Doc. 6. Defendant's detention hearing was continued to January 5, 2018, and at the conclusion of this hearing, the court set an initial status conference to take place in Courtroom 7 on April 16, 2018. Doc. 10. On March 28, 2018, counsel for the parties received a note from chambers of Courtroom 7 advising that there "will not be criminal status conference calendar that day", and asking the parties to instead select April 30, 2018 or May 7, 2018. After conferring about this issue, counsel for both parties determined that they were both available on May 7, 2018.

For the above stated reasons, the stipulated continuance will conserve time and resources both for the parties and the court, and the delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer