U.S. v. Leandro-Onofre, 1:18-po-00045-SAB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180406a49
Visitors: 35
Filed: Apr. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO ALLOW FIXED-SUM PAYMENT IN LIEU OF APPEARANCE; ORDER STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney Darin Rock, counsel for the plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Andrew Wong, counsel for defendant Marco Antonio Leandro-Onofre, that this case shall be resolved by payment of a fixed-sum in lieu of Mr. Leandro-Onofre's appearance pursuant to Federal Rule
Summary: STIPULATION TO ALLOW FIXED-SUM PAYMENT IN LIEU OF APPEARANCE; ORDER STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney Darin Rock, counsel for the plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Andrew Wong, counsel for defendant Marco Antonio Leandro-Onofre, that this case shall be resolved by payment of a fixed-sum in lieu of Mr. Leandro-Onofre's appearance pursuant to Federal Rule o..
More
STIPULATION TO ALLOW FIXED-SUM PAYMENT IN LIEU OF APPEARANCE; ORDER
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney Darin Rock, counsel for the plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Andrew Wong, counsel for defendant Marco Antonio Leandro-Onofre, that this case shall be resolved by payment of a fixed-sum in lieu of Mr. Leandro-Onofre's appearance pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 58(d)(1) and Local Rule Crim. 410.
Marco Antonio Leandro-Onofre agrees to pay a $350 fine and a $30 processing fee, for a total of $380 on or before June 7, 2018. Payment shall be made to the Central Violations Bureau. Upon payment of Citation No. 6044536, the parties agree that the status conference currently scheduled for June 7, 2018 will be vacated and this case will close.
ORDER
This defendant was ordered to appear based upon am mandatory appearance and not a bailable amount. Therefore, the request is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
