Miranda v. Berryhill, 2:17-CV-01653-CMK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180410763
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATIONAND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 35 Days to May 14, 2018, for Plaintiff to file his Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's second request for an extension. It is requested due to a backlog in Plaintiff's counsel's workload coupled with competing family obl
Summary: STIPULATIONAND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 35 Days to May 14, 2018, for Plaintiff to file his Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's second request for an extension. It is requested due to a backlog in Plaintiff's counsel's workload coupled with competing family obli..
More
STIPULATIONAND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 35 Days to May 14, 2018, for Plaintiff to file his Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's second request for an extension. It is requested due to a backlog in Plaintiff's counsel's workload coupled with competing family obligations. This will be Plaintiff's final request.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
