Torres v. Gipson, 1:16-cv-01525-LJO-MJS (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180411742
Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION REQUESTING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF NO. 32) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's December 15, 2017 motion requesting that the matter be set for a settlement conference. (ECF No. 32.) Defendants oppose the motion on the ground that their motion to dismiss is presently pending before the Court. In light of th
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION REQUESTING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (ECF NO. 32) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's December 15, 2017 motion requesting that the matter be set for a settlement conference. (ECF No. 32.) Defendants oppose the motion on the ground that their motion to dismiss is presently pending before the Court. In light of the..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION REQUESTING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
(ECF NO. 32)
MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's December 15, 2017 motion requesting that the matter be set for a settlement conference. (ECF No. 32.) Defendants oppose the motion on the ground that their motion to dismiss is presently pending before the Court.
In light of the present posture of the case, the Court concludes that a settlement conference would not be productive at the present time. The motion is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle