Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Verhoeven v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00991-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180411748 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because of a very heavy workload, and because of a preplanned upcoming weeklong vacation. The new due date
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because of a very heavy workload, and because of a preplanned upcoming weeklong vacation.

The new due date for Defendant's Responsive Brief will be Wednesday, May 9, 2018.

ORDER

Based upon the parties' stipulation, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time to May 9, 2018, in which to file an opposition to Plaintiff's opening brief; and all other deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer