Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Swillis, 1:17-cr-00237-DAD-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180411751 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the briefing schedule and hearing date currently set in Case No. 1:17-cr-00237-DAD-BAM be modified as follows: Defendant's Brief shall be filed by May 1, 2018. Plaintiff's Brief shall be filed by May 22, 2018. Defendant's Reply Brief shall be filed by May 29, 2018. Hearing to be held on June 4
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the briefing schedule and hearing date currently set in Case No. 1:17-cr-00237-DAD-BAM be modified as follows:

Defendant's Brief shall be filed by May 1, 2018. Plaintiff's Brief shall be filed by May 22, 2018. Defendant's Reply Brief shall be filed by May 29, 2018. Hearing to be held on June 4, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.

The parties are currently in plea negotiations and are approaching a resolution. The requested continuance is with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court. The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded until June 4, 2018, in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation, defense investigation, and plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). The parties further agree that the ends of justice served by taking this action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

The Court hereby grants the parties' request to modify the briefing schedule in the above-captioned matter as set forth in the above Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer