Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Alger v. FCA US LLC, 2:18-cv-00360-MCE-EFB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180411792 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON ANY MOTION TO DISMISS IN RESPONSE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff SHAWN ALGER, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED ("Plaintiff") and Defendant FCA US LLC, formerly known as CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record in this case, hereby stipulate and
More

STIPULATION AND APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE FILING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON ANY MOTION TO DISMISS IN RESPONSE

Plaintiff SHAWN ALGER, AS AN INDIVIDUAL AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED ("Plaintiff") and Defendant FCA US LLC, formerly known as CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record in this case, hereby stipulate and request that the Court approve the filing of a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), and a briefing schedule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the SAC, if any.

This stipulation and application for extension of time is based on the following facts:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this action on or about February 15, 2018;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in this action on or about February 16, 2018;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the Parties stipulated to a twenty-eight (28) day extension of Defendant's time to respond to the FAC up to and including April 10, 2018;

WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred on April 5, 2018 and April 6, 2018 regarding Plaintiff's CLRA claims contained in the FAC;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, subject to Court approval, there is good cause and efficiencies may be achieved for the parties and the Court by filing a SAC that addresses issues raised as part of the parties' meet and confer efforts. The parties also stipulate, agree and request the following deadline for answering the SAC in the event Defendant does not to file a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC or, in the alternative, a briefing schedule in the event Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than April 23, 2018. 2. Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiff's SAC no later than May 14, 2018. 3. If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC, Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed no later than June 4, 2018. 4. Any Reply in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC shall be filed no later than June 18, 2018. 5. The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC filed by the Defendant will be set for June 25, 2018.

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Stipulation and Application for Extension of Time submitted herewith, and good cause appearing, hereby enters the following order:

1. Plaintiff shall file its SAC no later than April 23, 2018. 2. Defendant shall file its Answer or Motion to Dismiss in response to Plaintiff's SAC no later than May 14, 2018. 3. If Defendant files a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC, Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed no later than June 4, 2018. 4. Any Reply in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC shall be filed no later than June 18, 2018. 5. The hearing date for any Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's SAC filed by the Defendant will be set for June 25, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer