Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cox v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation, 1:17-CV-0913-LJO-JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180416631 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER VACATING MID-DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SCHEDULING REPORT JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed the joint mid discovery status report. (Doc. 18) The report indicates that "Plaintiffs Robert Cox, Eric Coontz, and Brian Martinez (collectively "Plaintiffs")" no longer seeks to pursue this case on behalf of a class or a collection. Id. at 3. The report continues, "Plaintiffs have elected not to pursue conditional or class certificatio
More

ORDER VACATING MID-DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE; ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER SCHEDULING REPORT

The Court has reviewed the joint mid discovery status report. (Doc. 18) The report indicates that "Plaintiffs Robert Cox, Eric Coontz, and Brian Martinez (collectively "Plaintiffs")" no longer seeks to pursue this case on behalf of a class or a collection. Id. at 3. The report continues, "Plaintiffs have elected not to pursue conditional or class certification and intend to move forward on behalf of the above named individual." Id. Thus, it appears the action will proceed only as to Mr. Cox. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. No later than May 4, 2018, the parties SHALL file a joint, further scheduling report proposing deadlines for dispositive motions, the pretrial conference and the trial.

2. In light of the abandonment of the class and collective actions, the class certification deadlines as VACATED;

3. The mid-discovery status conference is VACATED. The parties are reminded of their obligation to complete discovery within the deadlines previously set by the Court (Doc. 17).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer