Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Denegal v. Farrell, 1:15-cv-01251-DAD-MJS (PC). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180417853 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION (ECF No. 65) MICHAEL J. SENG , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having considered the parties' stipulation, hereby ORDERS: Plaintiff is granted a seven day extension, up to and including April 18, 2018, to file a Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER ON STIPULATION (ECF No. 65)

The Court, having considered the parties' stipulation, hereby ORDERS:

Plaintiff is granted a seven day extension, up to and including April 18, 2018, to file a Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer