Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

West Pacific Electric Company Corporation v. Dragados/Flatiron, 1:18-CV-00166-LJO-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180418842 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Rule 144 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff West Pacific Electric Company, Inc. and Defendants Dragados/Flatiron, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company, The Continental Insurance Company, XL Specialty Insurance Company, The Insurance Company of the Stat
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Rule 144 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Plaintiff West Pacific Electric Company, Inc. and Defendants Dragados/Flatiron, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company, The Continental Insurance Company, XL Specialty Insurance Company, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, American Home Assurance Company, National Indemnity Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and Federal Insurance Company (collectively, "the Parties") hereby stipulate, agree, and request that the Scheduling Conference currently set for May 8, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. be continue to May 29, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. or such subsequent time as the Court deems appropriate. The Parties further stipulate that the case schedule set forth in the Court's Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Document 3) be modified as follows:

1. Deadlines currently set for April 18, 2018: LD for trial counsel for all parties to conduct and conclude a conference at a time and place arranged by counsel for the plaintiff, shall be moved to May 9, 2018; 2. Deadlines currently set for April 30, 2018: LD to file a Joint Scheduling Report be moved to May 21, 2018; and 3. Deadlines currently set for April 17, 2018 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) be moved to May 8, 2018.

There is good cause for this stipulation and request. The current Scheduling Conference was set for May 8, 2018 based on Plaintiff's Complaint being filed on January 30, 2018. Defendant Dragados/Flatiron filed a Motion to Dismiss on March 9, 2018 and it is set for hearing on April 10, 2018. A brief continuance of the Scheduling Conference and corresponding deadlines set forth above will allow the Parties to more meaningfully comply with their obligations under Rule 26 and the applicable Local Rules.

There have been no previous modifications pursuant to stipulation in this case and granting this stipulation and request will have no significant impact on the schedule for this case as no trial date has been scheduled.

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties' stipulation to continue the initial scheduling conference (Doc. 36), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from 5/8/2018 to Wednesday, May 30, 2018 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 8 before Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. A JOINT Scheduling Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in full compliance with the requirements set forth in the Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and a copy shall be emailed, in Word format, to bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The case schedule set forth in the Court's Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference (Document 3) is also modified as follows:

1. Deadline to conduct and conclude a conference at a time and place arranged by counsel for the plaintiff, shall be moved to May 9, 2018; 2. Deadline currently set for April 17, 2018 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) shall be moved to May 8, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer