Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mott v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00882-GSA. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180419911 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF GARY S. AUSTIN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 15 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because of a very heavy workload, and because of a preplanned upcoming weeklong vacation. The new due da
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER BRIEF

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 15 days to file her responsive brief. Defendant respectfully requests this extension of time because of a very heavy workload, and because of a preplanned upcoming weeklong vacation.

The new due date for Defendant's responsive brief will be Friday, May 4, 2018.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Defendant shall file an Opposition no later than May 4, 2018. Any Reply shall be filed within fifteen (15) days of the filing of any Opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer