Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Boozer v. Trinity Industries, Inc., 1:17-cv-01760 AWI JLT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180423603 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (Doc. 21) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 21) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (
More

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE (Doc. 21)

The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 21) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order "by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 79), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer