Collette v. Vision Security, LLC, 2:15-cv-00426-MCE-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180423639
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . On October 13, 2017 the District Court entered a Supplemental Pretrial Conference Scheduling Order which among other things, directed the parties to arrange for the scheduling of a settlement conference with the undersigned within 14 days from the date of the Order. ECF No. 48 at III. On March 19, 2018 the parties filed a Stipulation confirming to the conference on April 19, 2018. ECF No. 49 at 2:1-5. On April 11, conflicts aro
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . On October 13, 2017 the District Court entered a Supplemental Pretrial Conference Scheduling Order which among other things, directed the parties to arrange for the scheduling of a settlement conference with the undersigned within 14 days from the date of the Order. ECF No. 48 at III. On March 19, 2018 the parties filed a Stipulation confirming to the conference on April 19, 2018. ECF No. 49 at 2:1-5. On April 11, conflicts aros..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
On October 13, 2017 the District Court entered a Supplemental Pretrial Conference Scheduling Order which among other things, directed the parties to arrange for the scheduling of a settlement conference with the undersigned within 14 days from the date of the Order. ECF No. 48 at ¶ III. On March 19, 2018 the parties filed a Stipulation confirming to the conference on April 19, 2018. ECF No. 49 at 2:1-5.
On April 11, conflicts arose that required a rescheduling of the conference. The court's records show that the undersigned's Courtroom Deputy [CRD"] sent the attorneys for the parties an email offering alternate settlement conference dates of May 4 and May 18, 2018 and informed them that a response was required on the same day. Counsel responded that they were not available on the offered dates and requested available dates in June 2018. The CRD then offered them June 8 and June 22, 2018. Neither counsel responded to this email.
In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Within 10 days of the date of this Order trial counsel for the parties are directed to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to respond to the court's directions.
Source: Leagle
