Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DA v. Oroville Hospital, 2:17-cv-02478-KJM-DB (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180423673 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES, ISSUE SCHEDULING ORDER, AND ADMONISH PARTIES REGARDING SECURITY MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases, Issue Scheduling Order, and Admonish Parties Regarding Security, and finding sufficient good cause to so-exercise its discretion, orders as follows: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases, Issue Scheduling Order, and Admonish Parties
More

ORDER ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES, ISSUE SCHEDULING ORDER, AND ADMONISH PARTIES REGARDING SECURITY

The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases, Issue Scheduling Order, and Admonish Parties Regarding Security, and finding sufficient good cause to so-exercise its discretion, orders as follows:

The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases, Issue Scheduling Order, and Admonish Parties Regarding Security (ECF No. 17) in this matter. Specifically:

• DA, et al v. Oroville Hospital, Case No. 2:17-cv-00337-MCE-CMK and DA, et al v. Witt, et al, Case No. 2:17-cv-02478-KJM-DB are hereby consolidated; • The Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiffs' request for a scheduling conference to admonish the parties regarding security; • The Court will separately issue a Scheduling Order applicable to the consolidated cases.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer