Mastel v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02390-KJN. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180426a11
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate, with the approval of this Court, to a modification of the briefing schedule in this case. There is good cause for this extension because counsel for Plaintiff has determined that the certified administrative record lodged in this case is missing the hearing transcript, and counsel for Defendant must obtain those missing pages to file with this Court before completing th
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties stipulate, with the approval of this Court, to a modification of the briefing schedule in this case. There is good cause for this extension because counsel for Plaintiff has determined that the certified administrative record lodged in this case is missing the hearing transcript, and counsel for Defendant must obtain those missing pages to file with this Court before completing the..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate, with the approval of this Court, to a modification of the briefing schedule in this case. There is good cause for this extension because counsel for Plaintiff has determined that the certified administrative record lodged in this case is missing the hearing transcript, and counsel for Defendant must obtain those missing pages to file with this Court before completing the briefing of this case. The parties stipulate to the following briefing schedule:
1. Defendant shall have until May 7, 2018, to file a supplemental certified administrative record containing the hearing transcript.
2. Plaintiff shall have until June 6, 2018, to file his motion for summary judgment.
3. Defendant shall have until July 6, 2018, to file her cross-motion for summary judgment.
4. Plaintiff shall have until July 27, 2018, to file her reply, if any, to Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
