Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Martinez, 1:13-MJ-00132-SAB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180502f75 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 01, 2018
Latest Update: May 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER PLACING DEFENDANT INTO DETENTION STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Michael Tierney, Special Assistant United States Attorney Darin Rock, counsels for the plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Andrew Wong, counsel for defendant, Caleb W.F. Martinez, that defendant be detained as a flight risk under 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(1). The parties agree tha
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER PLACING DEFENDANT INTO DETENTION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Michael Tierney, Special Assistant United States Attorney Darin Rock, counsels for the plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender Andrew Wong, counsel for defendant, Caleb W.F. Martinez, that defendant be detained as a flight risk under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1).

The parties agree that the defendant failed to appear at the review hearing on May 4, 2017 (DE 63), and also failed to appear for a review hearing on November 20, 2014 (DE 17). Bench warrants were issued for each non-appearance. Id. The defendant also failed to appear for a sentencing hearing on April 16, 2015 (DE 46), but that non-appearance was later excused given that defendant was in state custody at the time of the hearing (DE 47).

On April 26, 2018, Martinez was taken into custody on the warrant related to the May 2017 failure to appear. At a brief telephonic conference on April 30, 2018, the United States requested the defendant's detention and defense counsel agreed to stipulate to the defendant's detention.

Accordingly, defendant should remain detained should continue to be detained since he continues to be a flight risk under 18 U.S.C. 3142.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The defendant is ORDERED DETAINED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer