Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hopson v. Albert, 1:17-cv-01745-LJO-SKO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180504d60 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: May 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO TERMINATE DEFENDANTS ASTIFNAS ALBERT and CHRISTOPHER ALBERT (Doc. 7) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, of Defendants Astifnas Albert and Christopher Albert with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. 7.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal b
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO TERMINATE DEFENDANTS ASTIFNAS ALBERT and CHRISTOPHER ALBERT

(Doc. 7)

On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, of Defendants Astifnas Albert and Christopher Albert with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (Doc. 7.)

In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). "The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice," and the dismissal "automatically terminates the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Because Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal of this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case has automatically terminated as to Defendants Astifnas Albert and Christopher Albert. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to TERMINATE Defendants Astifnas Albert and Christopher Albert.

This case shall remain OPEN pending resolution of Plaintiff's case against the remaining defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer