Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roudebush v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-01905-CKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180504d92 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Complaint will be extended by 32 days, from May 3, 2018 until June 4, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because additional time is needed to prep
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Complaint will be extended by 32 days, from May 3, 2018 until June 4, 2018.

This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because additional time is needed to prepare the administrative record.

The parties further stipulate that the briefing schedule shall be modified accordingly:

• Defendant shall file an opposition to Plaintiff's motion within thirty (32) days after service of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, on or before August 6, 2018. • Appellant's reply brief shall be filed with the court and served on respondent within twenty (21) days after service of Defendant's opposition, on or before August 27, 2018.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer