Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jackson v. Calone, 2:16-cv-00891-TLN-KJN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180504e17 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 151) KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has rescheduled Defendants' depositions to accommodate Defendants' counsel's trial schedule. To avoid potential prejudice to Plaintiff, the parties stipulate that any discovery issue arising from the re-scheduled depositions may be heard on fourteen days' notice, rather than the twenty-one days' notice provided by local rule, with joint statements due seven days
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 151)

Plaintiff has rescheduled Defendants' depositions to accommodate Defendants' counsel's trial schedule. To avoid potential prejudice to Plaintiff, the parties stipulate that any discovery issue arising from the re-scheduled depositions may be heard on fourteen days' notice, rather than the twenty-one days' notice provided by local rule, with joint statements due seven days before the hearing date. Upon approval of this stipulation by the Court, Plaintiff will withdraw her pending motion to compel and for sanctions (ECF No. 151).

So stipulated.

Based on the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the Court orders that any discovery issue arising from the re-scheduled depositions of Defendants in this matter may be heard on fourteen days' notice, rather than the twenty-one days' notice provided by local rule, with joint statements due seven days before the hearing date.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer