Fruits v. Shasta County Sheriff, 2:16-cv-1204 MCE KJN P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180511a49
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 10, 2018
Latest Update: May 10, 2018
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . By order filed April 3, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitte
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . By order filed April 3, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted..
More
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
By order filed April 3, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Source: Leagle
