Dittmar v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02469-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180514678
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 11, 2018
Latest Update: May 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Abigail P. Dittmar ("Plaintiff") and Nancy A. berryhill as the Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Abigail P. Dittmar ("Plaintiff") and Nancy A. berryhill as the Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and e..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
TO THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Abigail P. Dittmar ("Plaintiff") and Nancy A. berryhill as the Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserved to the Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant"), that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. The parties enter into this stipulation pursuant to the terms of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(1)(B).
ORDER
Approved and so ordered.
Source: Leagle