Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Johnson v. Hey Now Properties, 2:16-cv-02931-WBS-KJN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180514686 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 11, 2018
Latest Update: May 11, 2018
Summary: REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT [PROPOSED ORDER] WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Defendant's counsel respectfully requests permission to appear telephonically at the Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss, set for hearing May 14, 2018 at 1:30PM. Defendant's counsel has a previous scheduled Mediation at 10:30AM that day in San Jose, California, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with Howard Herman in the case Sc
More

REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE AT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT [PROPOSED ORDER]

Defendant's counsel respectfully requests permission to appear telephonically at the Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss, set for hearing May 14, 2018 at 1:30PM. Defendant's counsel has a previous scheduled Mediation at 10:30AM that day in San Jose, California, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with Howard Herman in the case Scott Johnson v. Petros, et. al., (I thought I had this case settled.) Counsel will call Judge William B. Shubb's chambers at 1:30pm from phone number (415) 298-7575. Defendant's counsel believes that a telephonic appearance will not hinder his ability to make an effective appearance. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer