Ryan v. City of Roseville, 2:17-cv-01453-MCE-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180516c42
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . ORDER Good cause appearing, the Court orders that the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order in civil action number 2:17-cv-01453-MCE-DB titled Richard J. Ryan v. City of Roseville, et al. , is amended to reflect the following changes: 1. All non-expert discovery shall be completed no later than February 23, 2019. 2. The initial disclosures of Defendant the City of Roseville, required by Rule 26(c)
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . ORDER Good cause appearing, the Court orders that the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order in civil action number 2:17-cv-01453-MCE-DB titled Richard J. Ryan v. City of Roseville, et al. , is amended to reflect the following changes: 1. All non-expert discovery shall be completed no later than February 23, 2019. 2. The initial disclosures of Defendant the City of Roseville, required by Rule 26(c) o..
More
ORDER MODIFYING INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
ORDER
Good cause appearing, the Court orders that the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order in civil action number 2:17-cv-01453-MCE-DB titled Richard J. Ryan v. City of Roseville, et al., is amended to reflect the following changes:
1. All non-expert discovery shall be completed no later than February 23, 2019.
2. The initial disclosures of Defendant the City of Roseville, required by Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules, shall be made not later than fourteen (14) days after this Court has issued its ruling on the City's pending Motion to Dismiss, Strike, and For a More Definite Statement.
3. The initial disclosures of Defendant Chris Robles, required by Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules, shall be made fourteen (14) days after this Court has issued its ruling on the Robles' pending Motion to Dismiss, Strike, and For a More Definite Statement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
