Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tabrez v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01242-JDP. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180522623 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE JEREMY D. PETERSON , Magistrate Judge . The parties, by and through their respective counsels, hereby stipulate to extend the time in which plaintiff must file his opening brief for a period of 28 days from May 10, 2018, to and including June 7, 2018, and that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 5, are extended accordingly. This is the first request for an extension in this matter. This request is ma
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties, by and through their respective counsels, hereby stipulate to extend the time in which plaintiff must file his opening brief for a period of 28 days from May 10, 2018, to and including June 7, 2018, and that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Scheduling Order, Doc. No. 5, are extended accordingly.

This is the first request for an extension in this matter. This request is made on behalf of counsel for plaintiff. This request is made pursuant to paragraph 12 of the Scheduling Order, permitting the filing of a single 30-day extension although the stipulation must be filed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

For the reasons provided in the parties' stipulation, the Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff additional time up to and including June 7, 2018, to file the opening brief. All other remaining deadlines in the scheduling order are modified accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer