Shamoeilyan v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:17-cv-0046-CMK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180523c24
Visitors: 28
Filed: May 22, 2018
Latest Update: May 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On April 18, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion within the appropriate time. Plaintiff has responded to the order to show cause and filed a motion for summary judgment. Good cause appea
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On April 18, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion within the appropriate time. Plaintiff has responded to the order to show cause and filed a motion for summary judgment. Good cause appear..
More
ORDER
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On April 18, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file a dispositive motion within the appropriate time. Plaintiff has responded to the order to show cause and filed a motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing therefor, the order to show cause is discharged. This action shall proceed according to the scheduling order issued April 5, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
