Rojas v. Brown, 1:17-cv-01514 DAD JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180524986
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 23, 2018
Latest Update: May 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION (Doc. 27) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Damages. (ECF No. 24.) 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3) provides that a responsive pleading is due within fourteen days of service of an amended pleading. Local Rule 144(a) permits the parties to stipulate, in writing, to extend the
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION (Doc. 27) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Damages. (ECF No. 24.) 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3) provides that a responsive pleading is due within fourteen days of service of an amended pleading. Local Rule 144(a) permits the parties to stipulate, in writing, to extend the t..
More
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT STIPULATION (Doc. 27)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Damages. (ECF No. 24.)1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3) provides that a responsive pleading is due within fourteen days of service of an amended pleading. Local Rule 144(a) permits the parties to stipulate, in writing, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise to respond to a complaint.
The parties have tentatively scheduled informal settlement discussions to take place on June 11, 2018. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that the time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading to the first amended complaint is extended for sixty days, up to and including July 14, 2018. The parties also stipulate and respectfully request that the Court set the scheduling conference in this matter on a date thirty days following the date that the defendants' responsive pleading is due.
ORDER
The stipulation for the third extension of time to respond to the complaint (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. However, absolutely no further extensions will be granted and no such requests will be entertained.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Attorney General's Office does not represent unserved Defendant Tegtmeyer. In exchange for this stipulation to extend the time for Defendants to file a responsive pleading, Defendants have agreed to waive service for newly named Defendant Espinoza.
Source: Leagle
