Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mojaddidi v. Olive Garden Italian Restaurant, 2:16-CV-01388-JAM-KJN. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180525627 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 22, 2018
Latest Update: May 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CONCURRENTLY FILED] JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Defendants GMRI, Inc., erroneously sued herein as Olive Garden Italian Restaurant ("GMRI"), and Gustavo Divencenzo ("Divencenzo") (collectively, "Defendants") and plaintiff Naomi Mojaddidi ("Plaintiff") (and together with Defendants, the "Parties") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Parties initiated the arbitration process with the American Arbitrati
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON CONCURRENTLY FILED]

Defendants GMRI, Inc., erroneously sued herein as Olive Garden Italian Restaurant ("GMRI"), and Gustavo Divencenzo ("Divencenzo") (collectively, "Defendants") and plaintiff Naomi Mojaddidi ("Plaintiff") (and together with Defendants, the "Parties") hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Parties initiated the arbitration process with the American Arbitration Association ("AAA");

WHEREAS, the Parties have fully executed a settlement of the current matter as to Plaintiff's claims and now seek a dismissal of those claims with prejudice;

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, that: Defendants be dismissed from this action with prejudice.

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

Based the parties' Stipulation For Dismissal Of Action, and good cause having been shown, the Court orders as follows:

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the above referenced matter is dismissed with prejudice.

Parties are to bear their own costs and fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer