Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Reyes, 2:17-cr-185 MCE. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180530a95 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through James Conolly, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, attorneys for Doroteo Reyes, stipulate that the status conference scheduled for May 24, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and the matter
More

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through James Conolly, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, attorneys for Doroteo Reyes, stipulate that the status conference scheduled for May 24, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to June 21, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. for further status conference.

Defense counsel requires additional time to review discovery with the defendant and pursue investigation, as well as continue negotiations toward a non-trial disposition.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including June 21, 2018; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

Time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including May 24, 2018, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the May 24, 2018 status conference shall be continued until June 21, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer