Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gentry v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01250-BAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180531874 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a two-week extension of time to June 13, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant's counsel requests this additional time because she has three other district court briefs due within the next week. This requ
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have a two-week extension of time to June 13, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant's counsel requests this additional time because she has three other district court briefs due within the next week.

This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time to June 13, 2018, in which to file an opposition to Plaintiff's opening brief. All other deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer